A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo
✓Claimant Juleisy Zabaleta Florez·Respondent Coomeva E.P.S.
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia por cuanto están sometidas a "eventual" revisión
- Rechazar por improcedente
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad interpuesta contra el auto que dispuso no seleccionar para revisión la tutela de la referencia.
Luego de analizar la petición formulada la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZARLA, por resultar manifiestamente improcedente.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR por manifiestamente improcedente, la petición interpuesta como "solicitud de nulidad" presentada por la ciudadana Juleisy Zabaleta Flórez en contra del Auto de Selección del 25 de enero de 2016.
- Segundo. ADVERTIR que contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.